Episode overview
Philip Marcovici has spent more than four decades advising wealth and business-owning families, first as a tax lawyer in Hong Kong in the years leading up to the handover, then in Zurich as private banking moved from undeclared money to transparency. In this conversation with Michael Macfarlane, he starts from an uncomfortable premise drawn from that experience. Any amount of wealth, he says, is enough to destroy a family. His first book examined that destructive power. His more recent one, The Transformative Power of Family Wealth, asks how the same resources can strengthen a family and its wider community.
Much of the discussion concerns the human system around money. Marcovici argues that society is not optional for wealthy families, however mobile they are, and that philanthropy and impact can draw in family members who have no interest in the operating business. He is frank about psychology. In his words, money makes people nuts, at every level of the family, and he describes cultural explanations for avoiding succession planning as overplayed. His remedy is open communication and involving the next generation in decisions that will ultimately rest with them. He also urges that every family member, including those who may one day inherit as widows, be prepared for the role.
The conversation widens to mobility and government. Marcovici distinguishes three kinds of mobility, of the wealth, of the holding entities and of the owner, and expects all three to become more restricted over time. He singles out Singapore and Switzerland as places where wealth owners pay meaningful tax in exchange for security and a fair society, and describes the UK's removal of the non-dom regime without a sensible replacement as an own goal. He closes by insisting that none of this is confined to the very rich. How parents decide to leave a single house can shape their children's lives as much as any family fortune.
Key ideas
Any amount of wealth can destroy a family
Marcovici's starting point comes from decades of client work. Whatever the level of wealth, he says, it is enough to damage relationships and businesses within a family. His earlier book, The Destructive Power of Family Wealth, documented that pattern. The newer book shifts the emphasis to how families, their advisers and governments can turn the same resources into something that strengthens the family and the communities around it.
Society is not optional
Borrowing the term optional society from a friend's book, Marcovici asks whether highly mobile wealth owners need to embed themselves anywhere. His conclusion is that they do, for business reasons, personal reasons and every other reason. A family thinking beyond one or two generations, he argues, cannot expect its business to survive if the planet and the communities around it do not.
Philanthropy as a way to engage the whole family
Marcovici sees wasted resources in families that focus only on the children who return to run the business. Impact and philanthropy, in his account, can draw other family members into stewardship. He describes a daughter who planned to give away a couple of hundred million US dollars and instead became interested in stewarding it, and the family's larger assets, to do good over generations.
Prepare everyone, trust no one
Women, Marcovici observes, end up with the money, because they tend to outlive men or through divorce. He has seen elderly family members placed under undue pressure to change succession arrangements. His remedy is preparation for all family members, women and men, and a planning discipline he summarises as trusting nobody. The point is to ask what could go wrong and plan from that basis.
Three kinds of mobility, and a narrowing window
Marcovici separates the mobility of wealth itself, of the entities that hold it, and of the owner. All three exist today and, he argues, families with multigenerational plans need all three, including diversified ownership across family members in different countries. He expects exit taxes and limits on multiple citizenship to spread, citing Singapore's single-citizenship rule, so the options will narrow.
What a trusted government offers wealth owners
Marcovici declines to praise jurisdictions for offering wealth owners a free ride. His examples of getting it right are Singapore and Switzerland, where wealth owners pay meaningful tax in exchange for long-term safety, security, good public services and a fair society. He describes the UK's removal of the non-dom regime without a sensible replacement as an own goal that cost it families' children and capital.
Succession belongs to the next generation
Asked how to avoid a toxic succession battle, Marcovici says nothing works better than open communication. Success in succession, he argues, is dictated by the next generation, so they should help shape the plan. He interviews each family member individually when working on family constitutions, and he regards claims that a particular culture's families do not fight as an excuse to avoid necessary work.
In their words
And sadly, I have to say that no matter what level of wealth, any amount of wealth is enough to destroy a family.
— Philip Marcovici, Wealth Office
My conclusion is society is not optional for business reasons, for personal reasons, for every reason.
— Philip Marcovici, Wealth Office
The first step is to recognise money makes people nuts.
— Philip Marcovici, Wealth Office
The bottom line is culture is important. However, it's way overplayed and it's way used as an excuse to not do the work necessary within families to really think about succession and transition.
— Philip Marcovici, Wealth Office
In other words, the success is not dictated by the older generation, it's dictated by the next generation.
— Philip Marcovici, Wealth Office
Quotes are taken word for word from the episode transcript.
Questions this conversation answers
What is The Transformative Power of Family Wealth about?
Marcovici describes it as a guide for families, younger generations and advisers, following his earlier book on the destructive power of family wealth. It draws on his teaching at the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership and examines how wealth can benefit families and their wider communities. He also hopes it helps governments understand how wealth and business-owning families can transform economies positively.
How does Philip Marcovici suggest families avoid succession disputes?
He says nothing works better than open communication. Because success in succession is dictated by the next generation, he encourages older generations to discuss their plans openly and seek the younger generation's input. In his own work on family constitutions he interviews each family member individually, and he warns against treating culture as a reason to skip succession planning.
Is this conversation relevant to families without great wealth?
Marcovici says it is. Any amount of money can create psychological issues and divide a family. For a family whose main asset is a house or modest savings, how parents decide to leave those assets may affect the children's lives even more than the decisions of a far wealthier patriarch. He says everything discussed applies at all levels of wealth.